In re Antuan B.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Antuan B.

289 A.D.2d 135, 734 N.Y.S.2d 447, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12398

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 20, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 289 A.D.2d 135 (In re Antuan B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Antuan B., 289 A.D.2d 135, 734 N.Y.S.2d 447, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12398 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Harold Lynch, J.), entered on or about October 5, 2000, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and placed him with the Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the court’s determinations concerning identification and credibility. Issues concerning purported discrepancies between the undercover officer’s description of appellant and appellant’s appearance on the night of the arrest were properly resolved by the trier of fact. Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Harold Lynch, J.), entered on or about October 5, 2000, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and placed him with the Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the court’s determinations concerning identification and credibility. Issues concerning purported discrepancies between the undercover officer’s description of appellant and appellant’s appearance on the night of the arrest were properly resolved by the trier of fact. Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

289 A.D.2d 135, 734 N.Y.S.2d 447, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-antuan-b-nyappdiv-2001.