in Re Antonio Sepeda

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 23, 2015
Docket14-15-00288-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Antonio Sepeda (in Re Antonio Sepeda) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Antonio Sepeda, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Abatement Order filed April 23, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-15-00288-CV ____________

IN RE ANTONIO SEPEDA, Relator

On Appeal from the 212th District Court Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 14-CV-0020

ABATEMENT ORDER

On April 1, 2015, relator Antonio Sepeda filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asked this Court to compel the Honorable Bret Griffin, Judge of the 212th District Court of Galveston County, Texas, to rule on relator’s petition for expunction in trial court cause number 14– CV–0020. On our own motion, we first consider the proper parties to this proceeding. We take judicial notice that Judge Griffin is no longer serving as Judge of the 212th District Court, and that Judge Patricia Grady now holds that position. Pursuant to Rule 7.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, Judge Grady is automatically substituted as a party, and this Court “must abate the proceeding to allow the successor to reconsider the original party’s decision.” See Tex. R. App. P. 7.2.

We therefore order the substitution of the Honorable Patricia Grady as respondent in this original proceeding, and abate the proceeding for 60 days from the date of this order. During the abatement, relator shall, by written pleading filed with the clerk of the trial court, specifically identify (by name and date of filing) each motion on which he seeks a ruling; request in a contemporaneously filed writing that the trial court clerk present the pleading to Judge Grady; obtain a ruling or documentation of the court’s refusal to rule; and amend his petition and appendix in this Court accordingly. The Court will then consider a motion to reinstate or dismiss this proceeding, as appropriate.

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Boyce and McCally.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Antonio Sepeda, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-antonio-sepeda-texapp-2015.