In re Antonio P.
359 N.E.2d 427, 40 N.Y.2d 960, 390 N.Y.S.2d 919, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3165
Opinion
Memorandum. Order affirmed, without costs, on the opinion by Judge Edith Miller in Family Court. It need only be added that appellant’s contentions were considered and by implication rejected by this court in Matter of Richard S. v City of New York (32 NY2d 592, mot for rearg den 33 NY2d 744). The cited provision of the statute has not changed since (Family Ct Act, § 255).
Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur in memorandum.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Antonio P., 359 N.E.2d 427, 40 N.Y.2d 960, 390 N.Y.S.2d 919, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3165 (N.Y. 1976).
359 N.E.2d 427 (In re Antonio P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Lorie C.
400 N.E.2d 336 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
In re Anthony P.
65 A.D.2d 294 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
In re Charles S
58 A.D.2d 584 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)