In re Antonio J.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Antonio J.

129 A.D.2d 988, 514 N.Y.S.2d 156, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45669

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 3, 1987

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 129 A.D.2d 988 (In re Antonio J.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Antonio J., 129 A.D.2d 988, 514 N.Y.S.2d 156, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45669 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: The evidence in this juvenile delinquency proceeding was insufficient to prove that respondent, if an adult, had committed the crime of assault in the third degree. The only evidence tending to establish that the victim had sustained physical injury was the victim’s testimony that he "had a black and blue face” and "sore ribs”, which were "bruised”. This evidence, without further elaboration on the extent of the injuries, fails to establish that the victim sustained either "impairment of physical condition” or "substantial pain” (Penal Law § 10.00 [9]; see, Matter of Philip A., 49 NY2d 198; Matter of Edward M., 88 AD2d 776; Matter of Derrick M., 63 AD2d 932). (Appeal from order of Erie County Family Court, Sedita, J.—juvenile delinquency.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Boomer, Green, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: The evidence in this juvenile delinquency proceeding was insufficient to prove that respondent, if an adult, had committed the crime of assault in the third degree. The only evidence tending to establish that the victim had sustained physical injury was the victim’s testimony that he "had a black and blue face” and "sore ribs”, which were "bruised”. This evidence, without further elaboration on the extent of the injuries, fails to establish that the victim sustained either "impairment of physical condition” or "substantial pain” (Penal Law § 10.00 [9]; see, Matter of Philip A., 49 NY2d 198; Matter of Edward M., 88 AD2d 776; Matter of Derrick M., 63 AD2d 932). (Appeal from order of Erie County Family Court, Sedita, J.—juvenile delinquency.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Boomer, Green, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

129 A.D.2d 988, 514 N.Y.S.2d 156, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45669, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-antonio-j-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack