in Re Antonio F. Cox
This text of in Re Antonio F. Cox (in Re Antonio F. Cox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed July 6, 2006.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-06-00521-CV
IN RE ANTONIO COX, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On June 8, 2006, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asked this court to compel the Honorable Debbie Stricklin, presiding judge of the 180th District Court of Harris County, to rule on his pro se motion to dismiss the indictment in his criminal case and his pro se motion for a speedy trial.
Relator has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed July 6, 2006.
Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges, Justice Yates, and Justice Guzman.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Antonio F. Cox, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-antonio-f-cox-texapp-2006.