In re Antonio C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Antonio C.

294 A.D.2d 123, 741 N.Y.S.2d 520, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5306

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 7, 2002

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 294 A.D.2d 123 (In re Antonio C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Antonio C., 294 A.D.2d 123, 741 N.Y.S.2d 520, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5306 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Harold Lynch, J.), entered on or about April 5, 2001, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon his admission that he had committed an act, which if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, and placed him on probation for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The record establishes that the court’s placement of appellant on probation was the least restrictive alternative consistent with his needs in light of his behavioral, attendance and academic problems at school performance, his association with older friends who were a negative influence and his mother’s [124]*124inability to supervise him (see, Matter of Katherine W., 62 NY2d 947). In these circumstances, the court’s determination that appellant required a period of supervision greater than the six months available under an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal was a proper exercise of discretion. Concur—Williams, P.J., Nardelli, Saxe, Rosenberger and Marlow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Harold Lynch, J.), entered on or about April 5, 2001, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon his admission that he had committed an act, which if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, and placed him on probation for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The record establishes that the court’s placement of appellant on probation was the least restrictive alternative consistent with his needs in light of his behavioral, attendance and academic problems at school performance, his association with older friends who were a negative influence and his mother’s [124]*124inability to supervise him (see, Matter of Katherine W., 62 NY2d 947). In these circumstances, the court’s determination that appellant required a period of supervision greater than the six months available under an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal was a proper exercise of discretion. Concur—Williams, P.J., Nardelli, Saxe, Rosenberger and Marlow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

294 A.D.2d 123, 741 N.Y.S.2d 520, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-antonio-c-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack