in Re: Antonio Bejaran, Jr.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 7, 2008
Docket13-07-00759-CR
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Antonio Bejaran, Jr. (in Re: Antonio Bejaran, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Antonio Bejaran, Jr., (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-07-759-CR



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

_______________________________________________________

IN RE: ANTONIO BEJARAN, JR. _______________________________________________________



On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
_______________________________________________________



MEMORANDUM OPINION



Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Vela

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion (1)



Relator, Antonio Bejaran, Jr., filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on December 31, 2007. However, the party filing a petition for a writ of mandamus bears the burden of providing the court with a sufficient record to establish the petitioner's right to mandamus relief. Tex. R. App. P. 52.7. The rules that govern our review of relator's petition require, for example, that the petition be accompanied by a certified or sworn copy of every document that is material to the relator's claim for relief and that was filed in any underlying proceeding. See id. at rule 52.7(a)(1); see also id. at rule 52.3(j) (required contents of appendix to petition include certified or sworn copy of "any order complained of"). Relator has not submitted an appendix or any other material constituting a record to support his petition. He, therefore, cannot demonstrate that the trial court has abused its discretion or violated a duty imposed by law.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus, is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See id. at rule 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM



Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).



Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this 7th day of January, 2008.

1. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) ("When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so."); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Antonio Bejaran, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-antonio-bejaran-jr-texapp-2008.