In re Antoine M.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Antoine M.

276 A.D.2d 793, 715 N.Y.S.2d 336, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10985

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 30, 2000

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 276 A.D.2d 793 (In re Antoine M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Antoine M., 276 A.D.2d 793, 715 N.Y.S.2d 336, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10985 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Queens County (De Phillips, J.), dated August 27, 1998, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court dated July 20, 1998, made after a hearing, finding that the appellant had committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of menacing in the second degree, adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent and placed him in the custody of the Office for Children and Family Services for a period of one year. The appeal brings up for review the fact-finding order dated July 20, 1998.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The appellant’s claim, raised for the first time on appeal, that the speedy trial provisions of the Family Court Act were violated, is untimely (see, Matter of Naiquan T., 265 AD2d 331; Matter of Anthony Q., 204 AD2d 647). O’Brien, J. P., McGinity, Luciano and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Queens County (De Phillips, J.), dated August 27, 1998, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court dated July 20, 1998, made after a hearing, finding that the appellant had committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of menacing in the second degree, adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent and placed him in the custody of the Office for Children and Family Services for a period of one year. The appeal brings up for review the fact-finding order dated July 20, 1998.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The appellant’s claim, raised for the first time on appeal, that the speedy trial provisions of the Family Court Act were violated, is untimely (see, Matter of Naiquan T., 265 AD2d 331; Matter of Anthony Q., 204 AD2d 647). O’Brien, J. P., McGinity, Luciano and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

276 A.D.2d 793, 715 N.Y.S.2d 336, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10985, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-antoine-m-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack