In re Antoine H.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Antoine H.

307 A.D.2d 929, 762 N.Y.S.2d 898

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 4, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 307 A.D.2d 929 (In re Antoine H.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Antoine H., 307 A.D.2d 929, 762 N.Y.S.2d 898 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, Antoine H. appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Pearce, J.), dated November 14, 2001, as, upon a fact-finding order of the same court dated August 15, 2001, finding that he committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of attempted sexual abuse in the first degree and attempted sexual abuse in the second degree, placed him in the custody of the New York State Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 12 months.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

Since the appellant challenges only so much of the order of disposition as placed him with the New York State Office of Children and Family Services, the appeal is academic, as the period of placement has expired (see Matter of Tanisha B., 296 AD2d 494 [2002]; Matter of Carlos S., 243 AD2d 569 [1997]). Feuerstein, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, Antoine H. appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Pearce, J.), dated November 14, 2001, as, upon a fact-finding order of the same court dated August 15, 2001, finding that he committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of attempted sexual abuse in the first degree and attempted sexual abuse in the second degree, placed him in the custody of the New York State Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 12 months.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

Since the appellant challenges only so much of the order of disposition as placed him with the New York State Office of Children and Family Services, the appeal is academic, as the period of placement has expired (see Matter of Tanisha B., 296 AD2d 494 [2002]; Matter of Carlos S., 243 AD2d 569 [1997]). Feuerstein, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

307 A.D.2d 929, 762 N.Y.S.2d 898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-antoine-h-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack