In re Antoine C.
297 A.D.2d 602, 747 N.Y.2d 370, 747 N.Y.S.2d 370, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8828
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 26, 2002·Published
Opinion
The court properly exercised its discretion in placing appellant with OCFS. In view of his lack of adequate parental supervision, his previous pattern of failing to attend, absconding from, and failing to benefit from rehabilitation programs, and his continued substance abuse problem, his interests would best be served in a limited secure placement with a structured environment (see Matter of Katherine W., 62 NY2d 947). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Buckley, Sullivan and Lerner, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Antoine C., 297 A.D.2d 602, 747 N.Y.2d 370, 747 N.Y.S.2d 370, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8828 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).
297 A.D.2d 602 (In re Antoine C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Katherine W.
468 N.E.2d 28 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)