In re Antinore

683 A.2d 629
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedSeptember 26, 1996
DocketNo. 241 Disciplinary Docket No. 3; Board File No. C1-96-164
StatusPublished

This text of 683 A.2d 629 (In re Antinore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Antinore, 683 A.2d 629 (Pa. 1996).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 26th day of September, 1996, William Michael Antinore having been disbarred from the practice of law in the State of New Jersey by Order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey dated March 28, 1996; the said William Michael Antinore having been directed on July 31, 1996, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the [630]*630imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and no response having been filed, it is

ORDERED that William Michael Antinore is disbarred from the practice of law in this Commonwealth, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
683 A.2d 629, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-antinore-pa-1996.