in Re: Anthony Wayne White

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 29, 2010
Docket12-10-00022-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Anthony Wayne White (in Re: Anthony Wayne White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Anthony Wayne White, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

NO. 12-10-00022-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS ' IN RE: ANTHONY WAYNE WHITE, RELATOR ' ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

' MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM Relator Anthony Wayne White complains in this original proceeding that he is being harassed by certain employees of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. 1 He requests a writ of mandamus directing these individuals to cease their retaliatory conduct, which he believes is the result of his status as a ―writ writer.‖2 A court of appeals has the authority to issue writs of mandamus against a judge of a district or county in the court of appeals district and all writs necessary to enforce its jurisdiction. TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221 (Vernon 2004). In order for employees of Texas Department of Criminal Justice to fall within our jurisdictional reach, it must be established that the issuance of the writ of mandamus is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. See id.; In re Coronado, 980 S.W.2d 691, 692-93 (Tex. App.–San Antonio 1998, orig. proceeding). White has not demonstrated that the exercise of our mandamus authority against the respondents is appropriate to enforce our jurisdiction. Consequently, we have no authority to issue a writ of mandamus. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Opinion delivered January 29, 2010. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)

1 The respondents are Nathaniel Quarterman, Director of Texas Department of Criminal Justice— Institutional Division; Lieutenant Johnathan Eastep; Kenneth Nash; Michael Beil; Warden Raymond Thompson; Dan Gannon; and Lisa Green. 2 White filed a document that is entitled, in part, ―Motion to Advise Court that Appellant is Being Restrained of His Liberty and Property. . . ,‖ requesting an order requiring prison employees and officials to cease their retaliatory acts or methods. Alternatively, he states that we may construe the document as a petition for writ of mandamus, and we have opted to do so.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Coronado
980 S.W.2d 691 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Anthony Wayne White, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-anthony-wayne-white-texapp-2010.