In re: Anthony Trappier

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 22, 2022·No. 22-1618·Unpublished

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1618 Doc: 11 Filed: 08/22/2022 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-1618

In re: ANTHONY GENE TRAPPIER,

Petitioner,

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (4:09-cr-00340-TLW-1; 4:12-cv-03313-TLW)

Submitted: August 18, 2022 Decided: August 22, 2022

Before WYNN, THACKER, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Gene Trappier, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-1618 Doc: 11 Filed: 08/22/2022 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Gene Trappier petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district

court has unduly delayed acting on Trappier’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion to reopen his

proceedings under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Trappier seeks an order from this court directing the

district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the court denied

the Rule 60(b) motion by order entered on July 21, 2022. Accordingly, because the district

court recently decided Trappier’s motion, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Anthony Trappier, (4th Cir. 2022).

In re: Anthony Trappier (In re: Anthony Trappier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related