in Re Anthony Robert Trejo
This text of in Re Anthony Robert Trejo (in Re Anthony Robert Trejo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-14-00619-CV
In re Anthony Robert Trejo
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator, Anthony Robert Trejo, an inmate in the Texas Department of Criminal
Justice, filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221;
see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.1. In his petition, Trejo appears to ask us to issue a writ of mandamus
directed to the “State of Texas,” the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, and “Federal Agents.”
By statute, this Court has the authority to issue a writ of mandamus against “a judge
of a district or county court in the court of appeals district” and other writs as necessary to enforce
our appellate jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221. None of the parties that Trejo has named
is a party against whom we may issue a writ of mandamus. Nor has Trejo demonstrated that the
exercise of our writ power is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. We have no jurisdiction to grant
Trejo any relief.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. __________________________________________
Melissa Goodwin, Justice
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Rose and Goodwin
Filed: October 14, 2014
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Anthony Robert Trejo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-anthony-robert-trejo-texapp-2014.