In Re Anthony Roberson v. the State of Texas

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: June 27, 2024
• Docket: 03-24-00325-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-24-00325-CR

In re Anthony Roberson

FROM THE 299TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-DC-95-953274, KAREN SAGE, JUDGE PRESIDING

ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant Anthony Roberson, an inmate appearing pro se, has filed notice of

appeal in this Court, seeking review of the trial court’s order under Chapter 64 of the Texas Code

of Criminal Procedure. The reporter’s record in this appeal was due on May 13, 2024. On

May 22, 2024, we notified appellant by letter that the reporter’s record was overdue and that,

according to the reporter, appellant had not requested preparation of the reporter’s record and

had not paid or made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record. In response to our notice,

appellant states that he has not made payment arrangements for the reporter’s record because he

lacks sufficient resources to pay for it. In addition, appellant has filed a declaration of inability

to pay costs and a motion for a free record.

The appeal is abated and remanded to the trial court. The trial court shall conduct

a hearing to determine whether appellant is presently indigent. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.2. If it

finds that the appellant cannot pay or give security for the appellate record, it shall order the preparation of the reporter’s record at no cost to appellant. See id. In addition, the trial court

shall consider appellant’s pending request, if any, for the appointment of appellate counsel.1

See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 64.01(c) (providing for limited statutory right to counsel in

Chapter 64 proceedings); see also In re King, No. 03-17-00484-CR, 2018 Tex. App. LEXIS 982,

at *2 (Tex. App.—Austin Feb. 1, 2018, order) (explaining that right to counsel under Chapter 64

“does not differentiate between trial and appellate stages”); cf. id. (refusing to abate for

appointment of appellate counsel under Chapter 64 because trial court had previously denied

request for appointment of counsel and appellant offered no reason why trial court might

reconsider its ruling). Following the hearing, which shall be transcribed, the trial court shall

order the appropriate supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records—including all findings and

orders—to be prepared and forwarded to this Court no later than July 30, 2024.

It is so ordered June 27, 2024.

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Kelly

Abated and Remanded

Filed: June 27, 2024

Do Not Publish

1 According to the appellant, after filing his notice of appeal, he filed a motion for appointment of counsel in the trial court by sending it to the district clerk by certified mail. To date, the clerk’s record does not include a motion for appointment of counsel.