In Re Anthony Ray Sloan v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 18, 2025
Docket01-25-00933-CR
StatusPublished

This text of In Re Anthony Ray Sloan v. the State of Texas (In Re Anthony Ray Sloan v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Anthony Ray Sloan v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

Opinion issued November 18, 2025

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-25-00933-CR ——————————— IN RE ANTHONY RAY SLOAN, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator Anthony Ray Sloan has filed a petition for writ of mandamus against

Michael Abner, Marilyn Burgess (Harris County District Clerk), Radarius Morrow,

and the Honorable Peyton Peebles, III, presiding judge of the 497th District Court,

a court exercising criminal jurisdiction.1 In particular, Relator asks this court to:

1 The underlying case is State of Texas v. Anthony Ray Sloan, cause number 189777801010, pending in the 497th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Peyton Peebles III presiding. 1. Accept jurisdiction in equity over the matter known as RF 773 776 491 US-11 Trust 1 Cause No. 189777801010;

2. Issue a Writ of Mandamus directing Respondents to proceed in equity rather than at law;

3. Recognize and confirm the appointment of Radarius Marrow as Co- Trustee, Custodian, and Fiduciary authorized to settle and close all outstanding public claims, charges, debts, and property matters related thereto;

4. Order the discharge of all corresponding public liabilities upon equitable settlement; and

5. Grant such other and further equitable relief as the Court deems just.

Relator’s petition contained no appendix or sworn record. Relator

subsequently filed a supplement, containing an appendix.

We deny the petition. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Any pending motions are

dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Guerra, Guiney, and Johnson.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re Anthony Ray Sloan v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-anthony-ray-sloan-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.