In re Anthony R.

14 A.D.3d 708, 788 N.Y.S.2d 616, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 802
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Anthony R.. Read the opinion of the Court — 43 A.D.3d 939

Opinion

In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the Law Guardian appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Lim, J.), dated November 21, 2002, which, after a hearing, denied her motion to hold the petitioner in contempt for violating an order dated September 21, 2000.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly denied the Law Guardian’s motion to hold the petitioner in contempt for violating an order dated September 21, 2000 (see Matter of Congregation Yetev Lev D'Satmar v Kahana, 308 AD2d 447 [2003]; Rupp-Elmasri v Elmasri, 305 AD2d 394 [2003]). Cozier, J.P., Ritter, Luciano and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Anthony R., 14 A.D.3d 708, 788 N.Y.S.2d 616, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 802 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

14 A.D.3d 708 (In re Anthony R.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rupp-Elmasri v. Elmasri
305 A.D.2d 394 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Congregation Yetev Lev D'Satmar, Inc. v. Kahana
308 A.D.2d 447 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)