In re Anthony O.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Anthony O.

215 A.D.2d 562, 627 N.Y.S.2d 935, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5074

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 215 A.D.2d 562 (In re Anthony O.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Anthony O., 215 A.D.2d 562, 627 N.Y.S.2d 935, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5074 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Gage, J.), dated September 23, 1993, which determined that he had permanently neglected his son, and terminated his parental rights.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court’s finding that the appellant’s son was a permanently neglected child was proper and supported by clear and convincing proof. The evidence established that, despite the petitioner’s diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the parent-child relationship, the appellant failed to substantially and continuously plan for the future of his son for more than one year (see, Social Services Law § 384-b [7] [a]; Matter of Gregory B., 74 NY2d 77). Balletta, J. P., Copertino, Altman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Gage, J.), dated September 23, 1993, which determined that he had permanently neglected his son, and terminated his parental rights.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court’s finding that the appellant’s son was a permanently neglected child was proper and supported by clear and convincing proof. The evidence established that, despite the petitioner’s diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the parent-child relationship, the appellant failed to substantially and continuously plan for the future of his son for more than one year (see, Social Services Law § 384-b [7] [a]; Matter of Gregory B., 74 NY2d 77). Balletta, J. P., Copertino, Altman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

215 A.D.2d 562, 627 N.Y.S.2d 935, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5074, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-anthony-o-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack