in Re Anthony L. Bannwart

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in in Re Anthony L. Bannwart. Read the opinion of the Court — 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 6349
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 20, 2013·No. 01-13-01094-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-13-01001-CV Style: In re Anthony L. Bannwart * Date motion filed : December 18, 2013 Type of motion: Motion for leave to resubmit response Party filing motion: Real party in interest Document to be filed: Response

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time: Original due date: Number of previous extensions granted: Current Due date: Date Requested:

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted If document is to be filed, document due:  Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ Real party in interest, Black Sigma, LLC, has filed a motion for leave to resubmit its response. Black Sigma LLC’s response was originally due December 17, 2013. However, the Court granted Black Sigma, LLC’s motion for extension, which extended the due date for the response to December 23, 2013. In conjunction with its motion to leave, Black Sigma, LLC filed its response on December 18, 2013. The response is timely and Black Sigma, LLC’s motion for leave is unnecessary. We deny the motion for leave as moot.

Judge's signature: /s/ Justice Laura C. Higley 

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: December 20, 2013

November 7, 2008 Revision

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Anthony L. Bannwart, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

in Re Anthony L. Bannwart (in Re Anthony L. Bannwart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.