In re: Anthony Johnson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re: Anthony Johnson. Read the opinion of the Court — 810 F.3d 1247
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided March 10, 2016·No. 16-10011·Published

Opinion

Case: 16-10011 Date Filed: 03/10/2016 Page: 1 of 1

[PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-10011

D.C. Docket No. 9:95-cr-08069-DTKH-1

In re: ANTHONY JOHNSON, Petitioner.

Appeal from the United States District Court Southern District of Florida

Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, HULL, MARCUS, WILSON, WILLIAM PRYOR, MARTIN, JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, JULIE CARNES, and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard en banc, and a majority of the judges of this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting rehearing en banc, It is ORDERED that this case will be reheard en banc. The panel’s February 26, 2016 and January 20, 2016 orders are VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Anthony Johnson, (11th Cir. 2016).

In re: Anthony Johnson (In re: Anthony Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.