In re Anthony F.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Anthony F.

214 A.D.2d 615, 624 N.Y.S.2d 964, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4066

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 10, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 214 A.D.2d 615 (In re Anthony F.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Anthony F., 214 A.D.2d 615, 624 N.Y.S.2d 964, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4066 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the presentment agency appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Palmer, J.),. dated May 6, 1993, which dismissed the petition.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the petition is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Kings County, for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Under the circumstances of this case, we find that the Family Court improperly dismissed the juvenile delinquency petition since the presentment agency demonstrated on the record that special circumstances existed to warrant a brief adjournment (Family Ct Act § 340.1 [6]; see, Matter of Carlos T., 187 AD2d 38; cf., Matter of Nakia L., 81 NY2d 898). Mangano, P. J., O’Brien, Ritter, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the presentment agency appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Palmer, J.),. dated May 6, 1993, which dismissed the petition.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the petition is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Kings County, for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Under the circumstances of this case, we find that the Family Court improperly dismissed the juvenile delinquency petition since the presentment agency demonstrated on the record that special circumstances existed to warrant a brief adjournment (Family Ct Act § 340.1 [6]; see, Matter of Carlos T., 187 AD2d 38; cf., Matter of Nakia L., 81 NY2d 898). Mangano, P. J., O’Brien, Ritter, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

214 A.D.2d 615, 624 N.Y.S.2d 964, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4066, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-anthony-f-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack