in Re: Anthony Arredondo
This text of in Re: Anthony Arredondo (in Re: Anthony Arredondo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DENY; and Opinion Filed May 17, 2016.
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-00514-CV
IN RE ANTHONY ARREDONDO, ET AL., Relators
Original Proceeding from the 199th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 199-01743-99
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang-Miers, Fillmore, and Schenck Opinion by Justice Lang-Miers In this petition for writ of mandamus, relators request that we order the trial court to
withdraw its April 20, 2016 order denying their motion to strike Dallas Police and Fire Pension
System’s Intervention or in the alternative to sever the intervention. Ordinarily, to be entitled to
mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion
and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124,
135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). We cannot conclude that relators have demonstrated that
they are entitled to relief. We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.
/Elizabeth Lang-Miers/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 160514F.P05 JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Anthony Arredondo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-anthony-arredondo-texapp-2016.