In re Ansel P.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Ansel P.

101 A.D.3d 428, 954 N.Y.2d 451

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 6, 2012

StatusPublished

This text of 101 A.D.3d 428 (In re Ansel P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Ansel P., 101 A.D.3d 428, 954 N.Y.2d 451 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning credibility. The evidence established the elements of each offense, and we have considered and rejected appellant’s arguments to the contrary. Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Sweeny, Richter, Román and Clark, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning credibility. The evidence established the elements of each offense, and we have considered and rejected appellant’s arguments to the contrary. Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Sweeny, Richter, Román and Clark, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

101 A.D.3d 428, 954 N.Y.2d 451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ansel-p-nyappdiv-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack