In re Anonymous

5 Sandf. 656
The Superior Court of New York City·Decided August 14, 1852·Published

Opinion

Duer, J.

I cannot follow the decision that has been cited ; the meaning of the code is, (§ 401,) that there shall be no stay of proceedings beyond twenty days, except upon notice to' the adverse party, and whether a stay exceeding the time limited, be granted, by a single order, or by successive orders, is immaterial. The intent of the provision is as much violated in the [657]*657one case as in the other, nor do the words force us to adopt a different construction. A second order extending the stay-twenty days beyond the twenty first allowed, is, as truly, an order to stay proceedings for a longer time than the code permits, as a single order for forty days.

Tho application must he denied.

The chief justice concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Anonymous, 5 Sandf. 656 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1852).

5 Sandf. 656 (In re Anonymous) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.