In re Anonymous
This text of 5 Sandf. 656 (In re Anonymous) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
I cannot follow the decision that has been cited ; the meaning of the code is, (§ 401,) that there shall be no stay of proceedings beyond twenty days, except upon notice to' the adverse party, and whether a stay exceeding the time limited, be granted, by a single order, or by successive orders, is immaterial. The intent of the provision is as much violated in the [657]*657one case as in the other, nor do the words force us to adopt a different construction. A second order extending the stay-twenty days beyond the twenty first allowed, is, as truly, an order to stay proceedings for a longer time than the code permits, as a single order for forty days.
Tho application must he denied.
The chief justice concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 Sandf. 656, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-anonymous-nysuperctnyc-1852.