In re Anonymous
20 A.D.2d 819, 248 N.Y.S.2d 786, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4180
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 23, 1964·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Application by petitioner, in his individual capacity, to discipline respondent, an attorney, on certain stated charges growing out of a civil action. Application dismissed. The petitioner is not the proper party to bring a disciplinary proceeding against an attorney (Matter of Tuck, 180 App. Div. 924; Matter of Anonymous No. 1, 13 N Y 2d 654). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Anonymous, 20 A.D.2d 819, 248 N.Y.S.2d 786, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4180 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).
20 A.D.2d 819 (In re Anonymous) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cowan v. Ernest Codelia, PC
149 F. Supp. 2d 67 (S.D. New York, 2001)