In re Anonymous

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Anonymous

277 A.D.2d 916

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 27, 1950

StatusPublished

This text of 277 A.D.2d 916 (In re Anonymous) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Anonymous, 277 A.D.2d 916 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Children’s Court, Rensselaer County, adjudging appellant a juvenile delinquent and committing him to the State Agricultural and Industrial School at Industry. The appellant denies the acts of molestation and annoyance of which he is accused; but the order is based on proof which, if accepted by the Judge who tried the ease, would justify finding the occurrence of the facts alleged. We find no legal basis for interfering with the judgment of the Children’s Court Judge in this respect. In deciding what remedial care should be given the appellant, consideration was given to his school record and his general record, and it will be assumed that the school at Industry is the facility most nearly appropriate to this boy’s needs and requirements, presently available in the State school system. These reasons lead us to affirm the result. Order of the Children’s' Court unanimously affirmed. Present •— Foster, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Deyo and Bergan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Children’s Court, Rensselaer County, adjudging appellant a juvenile delinquent and committing him to the State Agricultural and Industrial School at Industry. The appellant denies the acts of molestation and annoyance of which he is accused; but the order is based on proof which, if accepted by the Judge who tried the ease, would justify finding the occurrence of the facts alleged. We find no legal basis for interfering with the judgment of the Children’s Court Judge in this respect. In deciding what remedial care should be given the appellant, consideration was given to his school record and his general record, and it will be assumed that the school at Industry is the facility most nearly appropriate to this boy’s needs and requirements, presently available in the State school system. These reasons lead us to affirm the result. Order of the Children’s' Court unanimously affirmed. Present •— Foster, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Deyo and Bergan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 A.D.2d 916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-anonymous-nyappdiv-1950.