In re Anonymous

New York Court of Appeals

In re Anonymous

34 N.E.3d 51, 25 N.Y.3d 1083, 12 N.Y.S.3d 23

DecidedJune 9, 2015

StatusPublished

This text of 34 N.E.3d 51 (In re Anonymous) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Anonymous, 34 N.E.3d 51, 25 N.Y.3d 1083, 12 N.Y.S.3d 23 (N.Y. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Appeal dismissed without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that the two-Justice dissent is not on a question of law (see CPLR 5601 [a]).

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Pigott, Abdus-Salaam, Stein and Fahey. Judge Rivera dissents and votes to retain jurisdiction on the ground that the two-Justice dissent is on a question of law and supports an appeal as of right pursuant to CPLR 5601 (a).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Appeal dismissed without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that the two-Justice dissent is not on a question of law (see CPLR 5601 [a]).

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Pigott, Abdus-Salaam, Stein and Fahey. Judge Rivera dissents and votes to retain jurisdiction on the ground that the two-Justice dissent is on a question of law and supports an appeal as of right pursuant to CPLR 5601 (a).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 N.E.3d 51, 25 N.Y.3d 1083, 12 N.Y.S.3d 23, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-anonymous-ny-2015.