In re Anon
7 Wend. 331
Opinion
A motion was made for a new trial, on the ground of newly discovered evidence, and nothing but the affidavits in support of the motion were handed up. The court refused to hear the motion, because the affidavits were not accompaing by a case, shewing what transpired on the trial, observing that such was the settled practice of the court, and that it would not be departed from.
[333]*333CASES ARGUED AND DETERMINED IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE OF THE STATE OF NEW-YORK. IN JULY TERM, 1831, IN THE FIFTY-SIXTH YEAR OP OUR INDEPENDENCE.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Anon, 7 Wend. 331 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1831).
7 Wend. 331 (In re Anon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Boyd v. Boyd
32 N.Y.S. 295 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1895)
Bantheon v. Meier
30 N.Y.S. 706 (New York Supreme Court, 1894)
Michel v. Colegrove
19 N.Y.S. 716 (Superior Court of New York, 1892)
Michel v. Colegrove
29 Jones & S. 278 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1892)
Hossley v. Colerick
1 How. Pr. (n.s.) 169 (New York Supreme Court, 1886)
State v. Lautenschlager
23 Minn. 290 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1877)
Warner v. Western Transportation Co.
5 Rob. 490 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1868)
Leavy v. Roberts
8 Abb. Pr. 310 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1858)
People v. O'Brien
4 Park. Cr. 203 (Superior Court of Buffalo, 1854)
State v. Adams
8 Rob. 571 (Louisiana Court of Errors and Appeals, 1845)
State v. Charlot
8 Rob. 529 (Louisiana Court of Errors and Appeals, 1844)