In re Annenko

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Annenko

725 A.2d 674, 157 N.J. 551, 1999 N.J. LEXIS 273

DecidedMarch 19, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 725 A.2d 674 (In re Annenko) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Annenko, 725 A.2d 674, 157 N.J. 551, 1999 N.J. LEXIS 273 (N.J. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Court on December 29,1998, having ordered that the three-month suspension from practice of LUBA ANNENKO of CHERRY HILL ordered by the Court on November 18, 1998, to be effective December 15, 1998, be stayed and that the matter be summarily remanded to the Disciplinary Review Board to permit respondent to apply to the Board to vacate its decision in this matter and for a remand to the District Ethics Committee for proceedings on the merits;

And the Disciplinary Review Board having reported to the Court that the Board granted respondent’s application to vacate the default and that respondent has filed a timely answer to the ethics complaint filed against her;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the Order of the Court filed in this matter on November 18, 1998, that suspends LUBA ANNENKO from practice effective December 15,1998, is hereby vacated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Court on December 29,1998, having ordered that the three-month suspension from practice of LUBA ANNENKO of CHERRY HILL ordered by the Court on November 18, 1998, to be effective December 15, 1998, be stayed and that the matter be summarily remanded to the Disciplinary Review Board to permit respondent to apply to the Board to vacate its decision in this matter and for a remand to the District Ethics Committee for proceedings on the merits;

And the Disciplinary Review Board having reported to the Court that the Board granted respondent’s application to vacate the default and that respondent has filed a timely answer to the ethics complaint filed against her;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the Order of the Court filed in this matter on November 18, 1998, that suspends LUBA ANNENKO from practice effective December 15,1998, is hereby vacated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

725 A.2d 674, 157 N.J. 551, 1999 N.J. LEXIS 273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-annenko-nj-1999.