In re Annastasia C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Annastasia C.

78 A.D.3d 1578, 912 N.Y.S.2d 473

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 12, 2010

DocketAppeal No. 1

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 78 A.D.3d 1578 (In re Annastasia C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Annastasia C., 78 A.D.3d 1578, 912 N.Y.S.2d 473 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Cattaraugus County (Michael L. Nenno, J.), entered June 30, 2009 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10. The order, among other things, adjudged that respondent had neglected the subject child.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: In these consolidated appeals, respondent father appeals from two orders adjudging that he had abused one of his children and derivatively neglected two of his other children as a result of that abuse. Contrary to the sole contention of the father on appeal, the out-of-court allegations of abuse made by one child against him were sufficiently corroborated (see Matter of Annastasia C. [Carol C.], 78 AD3d 1578 [2010] [decided herewith]). Present — Smith, J.P., Peradotto, Carni, Sconiers and Gorski, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Cattaraugus County (Michael L. Nenno, J.), entered June 30, 2009 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10. The order, among other things, adjudged that respondent had neglected the subject child.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: In these consolidated appeals, respondent father appeals from two orders adjudging that he had abused one of his children and derivatively neglected two of his other children as a result of that abuse. Contrary to the sole contention of the father on appeal, the out-of-court allegations of abuse made by one child against him were sufficiently corroborated (see Matter of Annastasia C. [Carol C.], 78 AD3d 1578 [2010] [decided herewith]). Present — Smith, J.P., Peradotto, Carni, Sconiers and Gorski, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

78 A.D.3d 1578, 912 N.Y.S.2d 473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-annastasia-c-nyappdiv-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack