In Re Anna Nyulund v. the State of Texas

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)·Decided May 8, 2026·No. 03-26-00426-CV·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-26-00426-CV

In re Anna Nyulund

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied in part. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

To the extent that relator seeks issuance of a writ of mandamus for matters not currently before

us and/or against the Travis County District Clerk, a justice of the peace, and Frost Bank, we

dismiss the petition for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221(b); Gregory

v. Stetson, 133 U.S. 579, 586 (1890) (“It is an elementary principle that a court cannot adjudicate

directly upon a person’s right without having him either actually or constructively before it. This

principle is fundamental.”). Relator’s request for emergency relief is dismissed as moot.

Maggie Ellis, Justice

Before Justices Triana, Kelly, and Ellis

Filed: May 8, 2026

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Anna Nyulund v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2026).

In Re Anna Nyulund v. the State of Texas (In Re Anna Nyulund v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gregory v. Stetson
133 U.S. 579 (Supreme Court, 1890)