In Re Anna Nyulund v. the State of Texas

CourtTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
DecidedMay 8, 2026
Docket03-26-00426-CV
StatusPublished

This text of In Re Anna Nyulund v. the State of Texas (In Re Anna Nyulund v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Anna Nyulund v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-26-00426-CV

In re Anna Nyulund

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied in part. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

To the extent that relator seeks issuance of a writ of mandamus for matters not currently before

us and/or against the Travis County District Clerk, a justice of the peace, and Frost Bank, we

dismiss the petition for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221(b); Gregory

v. Stetson, 133 U.S. 579, 586 (1890) (“It is an elementary principle that a court cannot adjudicate

directly upon a person’s right without having him either actually or constructively before it. This

principle is fundamental.”). Relator’s request for emergency relief is dismissed as moot.

__________________________________________ Maggie Ellis, Justice

Before Justices Triana, Kelly, and Ellis

Filed: May 8, 2026

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gregory v. Stetson
133 U.S. 579 (Supreme Court, 1890)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re Anna Nyulund v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-anna-nyulund-v-the-state-of-texas-txctapp3-2026.