In Re: ANL of Attry. Smith
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
IN RE: A.N.L. (APPEAL OF A.B.) : No. 118 MM 2017 : : PETITION OF: MICHAEL B. SMITH, : ESQUIRE :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 13th day of October, 2017, upon consideration of the Application
to Withdraw, it is noted that no Petition for Allowance of Appeal was advanced within
the filing period. See Pa.R.A.P. 105(b) (providing that the time period for filing an
allocatur petition may not be enlarged). Moreover, there is no other allocatur-related
submission before this Court.
As the application is not related to a filing pending in this tribunal, there is no
evident jurisdictional basis for its consideration. See Reading Anthracite Co. v. Rich,
577 A.2d 881 (Pa. 1990) (observing that the timeliness of an appeal is jurisdictional).
Accordingly, the Application to Withdraw is DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re: ANL of Attry. Smith (In Re: ANL of Attry. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.