In Re Anjeneya Vijay Cheruvu v. the State of Texas

• Court: Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
• Decided: April 14, 2026
• Docket: 01-26-00320-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

Opinion issued April 14, 2026

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-26-00320-CV ——————————— IN RE ANJENEYA VIJAY CHERUVU, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Anjeneya Vijay Cheruvu, proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ

of mandamus challenging the trial court’s March 19, 2026 “Order Holding [Relator]

in Contempt (Possession or Access).”1 In his petition for writ of mandamus, relator

argued that the trial court’s contempt order was void because “the trial court lacked

1 The underlying case is In the Interest of XXX, a Child, Cause No. 14-DCV-217759, in the 505th District Court of Fort Bend County, Texas, the Honorable Kali L. Morgan presiding. jurisdiction to render” the order. Relator therefore requested that this Court grant

mandamus relief and direct the trial court to vacate its March 19, 2026 contempt

order.

We conclude that relator has failed to establish he is entitled to mandamus

relief, and therefore, the Court denies relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. We

dismiss any pending motion as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Guerra and Guiney.