In Re: Angela T., Ekene T., and Ember T. - Concurring in Part and Partial Dissent

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

In Re: Angela T., Ekene T., and Ember T. - Concurring in Part and Partial Dissent

DecidedFebruary 23, 2012

DocketW2011-01588-COA-R3-PT

StatusPublished

This text of In Re: Angela T., Ekene T., and Ember T. - Concurring in Part and Partial Dissent (In Re: Angela T., Ekene T., and Ember T. - Concurring in Part and Partial Dissent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re: Angela T., Ekene T., and Ember T. - Concurring in Part and Partial Dissent, (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON January 18, 2012 Session

IN RE: ANGELA T., EKENE T., and EMBER T.

Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Madison County No. 56951 William C. Cole, Chancellor by Designation

No. W2011-01588-COA-R3-PT - Filed February 23, 2012

CONCURRING IN PART AND PARTIAL DISSENT ___________________________________

HOLLY M. KIRBY, JUDGE, CONCURRING IN PART AND PARTIAL DISSENT:

I concur fully in the majority’s finding that Father abandoned his children by willful failure to visit them. I must reluctantly dissent from the majority’s finding that Father’s child support payments during the pivotal four-month period amounted to abandonment by willful failure to support. The trial court viewed Father’s testimony and considered his payment history during the four-month period, and found no willful intent to abandon. While Father clearly had the means to pay his full child support obligation, in view of the trial court’s finding and the evidence on his payments, I must respectfully disagree that the record shows by clear and convincing evidence abandonment by failure to support.

Therefore, I concur in part and dissent in part.

_______________________________________ HOLLY M. KIRBY, JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON January 18, 2012 Session

IN RE: ANGELA T., EKENE T., and EMBER T.

Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Madison County No. 56951 William C. Cole, Chancellor by Designation

No. W2011-01588-COA-R3-PT - Filed February 23, 2012

CONCURRING IN PART AND PARTIAL DISSENT ___________________________________

HOLLY M. KIRBY, JUDGE, CONCURRING IN PART AND PARTIAL DISSENT:

I concur fully in the majority’s finding that Father abandoned his children by willful failure to visit them. I must reluctantly dissent from the majority’s finding that Father’s child support payments during the pivotal four-month period amounted to abandonment by willful failure to support. The trial court viewed Father’s testimony and considered his payment history during the four-month period, and found no willful intent to abandon. While Father clearly had the means to pay his full child support obligation, in view of the trial court’s finding and the evidence on his payments, I must respectfully disagree that the record shows by clear and convincing evidence abandonment by failure to support.

Therefore, I concur in part and dissent in part.

_______________________________________ HOLLY M. KIRBY, JUDGE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

In Re: Angela T., Ekene T., and Ember T. - Concurring in Part and Partial Dissent, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-angela-t-ekene-t-and-ember-t-concurring-in-p-tennctapp-2012.