In re Angel S.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Angel S.

282 A.D.2d 378, 723 N.Y.S.2d 369, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4112

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 24, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 282 A.D.2d 378 (In re Angel S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Angel S., 282 A.D.2d 378, 723 N.Y.S.2d 369, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4112 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Harold Lynch, J.), entered on or about October 1, 1999, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that appellant committed acts that, if committed by an adult, would have constituted resisting arrest and attempted assault in the third degree, and placed him with the New York State Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 1 year, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the court’s determinations concerning credibility. The credible evidence clearly established the elements of resisting arrest and attempted assault. Concur— Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Harold Lynch, J.), entered on or about October 1, 1999, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that appellant committed acts that, if committed by an adult, would have constituted resisting arrest and attempted assault in the third degree, and placed him with the New York State Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 1 year, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the court’s determinations concerning credibility. The credible evidence clearly established the elements of resisting arrest and attempted assault. Concur— Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

282 A.D.2d 378, 723 N.Y.S.2d 369, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-angel-s-nyappdiv-2001.