In re Angel R.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Angel R.

285 A.D.2d 407, 729 N.Y.S.2d 389, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7495

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 19, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 285 A.D.2d 407 (In re Angel R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Angel R., 285 A.D.2d 407, 729 N.Y.S.2d 389, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7495 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Orders, Family Court, Bronx County (Allen Alpert, J.), entered on or about June 5, 2000, which dismissed the instant neglect petition for lack of readiness to proceed at the fact-finding hearing, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

While Family Court might have extended petitioner yet another continuance to locate its witness, we nevertheless affirm because the court correctly concluded that its aid was not required in this case (Family Ct Act § 1051 [c]). The two older children are in Puerto Rico with their grandmother, and the youngest child is already under petitioner’s supervision. Concur — Mazzarelli, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Rubin and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Orders, Family Court, Bronx County (Allen Alpert, J.), entered on or about June 5, 2000, which dismissed the instant neglect petition for lack of readiness to proceed at the fact-finding hearing, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

While Family Court might have extended petitioner yet another continuance to locate its witness, we nevertheless affirm because the court correctly concluded that its aid was not required in this case (Family Ct Act § 1051 [c]). The two older children are in Puerto Rico with their grandmother, and the youngest child is already under petitioner’s supervision. Concur — Mazzarelli, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Rubin and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

285 A.D.2d 407, 729 N.Y.S.2d 389, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-angel-r-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack