In re Angel Marie L.

8 A.D.3d 669, 778 N.Y.S.2d 901, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9151
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 28, 2004·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, nonparty, Daniel J. Schneider, appeals from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Forman, J.), entered October 26, 2003, which adjudged him in contempt and imposed a fine in the sum of $250.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the finding of contempt and the fine are vacated.

The Family Court erred in adjudging the appellant to be in contempt pursuant to Judiciary Law § 753 without affording him notice and an opportunity to be heard pursuant to Judiciary Law § 756 (see Cappello v Cappello, 274 AD2d 538 [2000]; Matter of Dawn P., 180 AD2d 800 [1992]). Prudenti, P.J., Ritter, Cozier and Skelos, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Angel Marie L., 8 A.D.3d 669, 778 N.Y.S.2d 901, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9151 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

8 A.D.3d 669 (In re Angel Marie L.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Xand Corp. v. Reliable Systems Alternatives Corp.
35 A.D.3d 849 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)