In re Angel F.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Angel F.

249 A.D.2d 239, 672 N.Y.S.2d 680, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4772

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 30, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 249 A.D.2d 239 (In re Angel F.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Angel F., 249 A.D.2d 239, 672 N.Y.S.2d 680, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4772 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order of disposi[240]*240tion, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John Hunt, J.), entered on or about December 19, 1996, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that appellant had committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of sexual abuse in the second degree, and placed him on probation for a period of 9 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The record reflects that the evidence was legally sufficient and that the court’s findings were not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the court’s credibility determinations. We have reviewed appellant’s remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Rubin, Williams and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order of disposi[240]*240tion, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John Hunt, J.), entered on or about December 19, 1996, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that appellant had committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of sexual abuse in the second degree, and placed him on probation for a period of 9 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The record reflects that the evidence was legally sufficient and that the court’s findings were not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the court’s credibility determinations. We have reviewed appellant’s remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Rubin, Williams and Andrias, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 A.D.2d 239, 672 N.Y.S.2d 680, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4772, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-angel-f-nyappdiv-1998.