in Re: Andrew Wilkerson

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 10, 2022
Docket05-21-00617-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Andrew Wilkerson (in Re: Andrew Wilkerson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Andrew Wilkerson, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

DENY and Opinion Filed January 10, 2022

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00617-CV

IN RE ANDREW WILKERSON, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 301st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-19-21377

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Molberg, Reichek, and Smith Opinion by Justice Smith In this original proceeding, relator challenges the trial court’s contempt order

in the underlying suit affecting the parent-child relationship. Entitlement to

mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court clearly abused its

discretion and that he lacks an adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co.,

148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding).

Based on our review of the petition and the record, we conclude that relator

has failed to show his entitlement to the relief requested. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

/Craig Smith/ CRAIG SMITH JUSTICE 210617F.P05

–2–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America
148 S.W.3d 124 (Texas Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Andrew Wilkerson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-andrew-wilkerson-texapp-2022.