in Re Andrew W. McAdoo
This text of in Re Andrew W. McAdoo (in Re Andrew W. McAdoo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas April 10, 2018
No. 04-17-00628-CV
IN RE Andrew W. MCADOO
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
ORDER
Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice (dissent to follow) Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Irene Rios, Justice
On September 28, 2017, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for temporary relief. The real parties filed a response, to which relator later replied. After considering the petition, response, and reply, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The court’s opinion will issue at a later date.
It is so ORDERED on April 10, 2018.
_________________________________ Irene Rios, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 10th day of April, 2018.
___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE, Clerk of Court
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2015-CVT-002862-D3, styled KLH and OJH, Individually and as Next Friend of JPH v. Dr. Andrew McAdoo, pending in the 341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas, the Honorable Rebecca Ramirez Palomo presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Andrew W. McAdoo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-andrew-w-mcadoo-texapp-2018.