in Re Andrew Sullo
This text of in Re Andrew Sullo (in Re Andrew Sullo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued November 13, 2014
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-14-00882-CV ——————————— IN RE ANDREW SULLO, Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator, Andrew Sullo, filed a petition for writ of mandamus on October 31,
2014, seeking to compel the respondent trial court to vacate its October 16, 2014
order granting the motion to compel the identities of callers, filed by the
defendants/real parties in interest, by October 31, 2014.1 With the petition, relator
also included a motion for a stay of all proceedings pending resolution of his 1 The underlying case is William Carter, et al. v. Kubosh Bail Bonding, et al., Cause No. 2013-50819, pending in the 129th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Michael Gomez presiding. petition. The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition, is of the
opinion that relator has not established himself entitled to the mandamus relief
sought.
Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 52.8(a), (d). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Brown.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Andrew Sullo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-andrew-sullo-texapp-2014.