in Re Andrew McAdoo, D.O.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas October 17, 2016
No. 04-16-00618-CV
In re Andrew MCADOO, D.O.
Original Mandamus Proceeding1
ORDER
Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Jason Pulliam, Justice
The court has considered relator’s petition for a writ of mandamus and the response filed by the real-parties-in-interest and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for a writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Relator’s motion for stay of the trial court’s amended order is DENIED. The court’s opinion will issue at a later date.
It is so ORDERED on October 17, 2016.
_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 17th day of October, 2016.
___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2015CVT002862 D3, styled K.L.H. and O.L.H., Individually and as Next Friend of J.P.H. v. Doctors Hospital of Laredo and Dr. Andrew McAdoo, pending in the 341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas, the Honorable Rebecca Ramirez Palomo presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Andrew McAdoo, D.O. (in Re Andrew McAdoo, D.O.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.