in Re Andrew Louis Santos
This text of in Re Andrew Louis Santos (in Re Andrew Louis Santos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas May 11, 2016
No. 04-16-00265-CV
IN RE ANDREW LOUIS SANTOS
Original Mandamus Proceeding1
ORDER
Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
On May 2, 2016, real party-in-interest filed a response to the petition for writ of mandamus in this case which included a motion for sanctions. The court has considered the motion and is of the opinion that real party-in-interest is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the motion for sanctions is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.11.
It is so ORDERED on May 11, 2016.
_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 11th day of May, 2016.
___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2014-CI-18709, styled In the Interest of A.G.S., A Child, pending in the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Solomon Casseb, III presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Andrew Louis Santos, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-andrew-louis-santos-texapp-2016.