in Re: Andrew C. Kyle IV

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 29, 2004·No. 14-04-00271-CV·Published

Opinion

Writ of Coram Nobis Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed April 29, 2004

Writ of Coram Nobis Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed April 29, 2004.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-04-00271-CV

____________

IN RE ANDREW C. KYLE, IV,

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF CORAM NOBIS

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

On March 25, 2004, Andrew C. Kyle, IV filed a request for writ of coram nobis in this court.  See Tex. R. App. P. 52.

The purpose of a writ of coram nobis is to bring before the court that rendered judgment factual matters, which, if known at the time judgment was rendered, would have prevented its rendition.  Ex parte McKenzie, 29 S.W.2d 771, 772 (Tex. Crim. App. 1930); see also, Taylor v. Hustead & Tucker, 257 S.W.2d 232, 235 (Tex. Comm=n App. 1924).  The common law writ of coram nobis is not recognized in this state.  Ex parte Massey, 249 S.W.2d 599, 601 (Tex. Crim. App. 1952).

The writ of coram nobis is denied.


PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed April 29, 2004.

Panel consists of Justices Yates, Anderson, and Hudson.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re: Andrew C. Kyle IV, (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

in Re: Andrew C. Kyle IV (in Re: Andrew C. Kyle IV) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Massey
249 S.W.2d 599 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1952)
Thomas v. Aines Farm Dairy
257 S.W.2d 228 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1953)
Ex Parte McKenzie
29 S.W.2d 771 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1930)