in Re: Andrew C. Kyle IV
This text of in Re: Andrew C. Kyle IV (in Re: Andrew C. Kyle IV) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Writ of Coram Nobis Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed April 29, 2004.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-04-00271-CV
IN RE ANDREW C. KYLE, IV,
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF CORAM NOBIS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On March 25, 2004, Andrew C. Kyle, IV filed a request for writ of coram nobis in this court. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.
The purpose of a writ of coram nobis is to bring before the court that rendered judgment factual matters, which, if known at the time judgment was rendered, would have prevented its rendition. Ex parte McKenzie, 29 S.W.2d 771, 772 (Tex. Crim. App. 1930); see also, Taylor v. Hustead & Tucker, 257 S.W.2d 232, 235 (Tex. Comm=n App. 1924). The common law writ of coram nobis is not recognized in this state. Ex parte Massey, 249 S.W.2d 599, 601 (Tex. Crim. App. 1952).
The writ of coram nobis is denied.
PER CURIAM
Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed April 29, 2004.
Panel consists of Justices Yates, Anderson, and Hudson.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Andrew C. Kyle IV, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-andrew-c-kyle-iv-texapp-2004.