in Re Andres Waibel
This text of in Re Andres Waibel (in Re Andres Waibel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed March 12, 2009.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-09-00190-CV
IN RE ANDRES WAIBEL, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On February 26, 2009, relator, Andres Waibel, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator requests that we compel the respondent, the Honorable Roberta Lloyd, presiding judge of County Court at Law No. 4 of Harris County, to continue the March 2, 2009 bench trial, enter a docket control order setting deadlines for discovery, intervention, or parties, and setting a trial date no earlier than forty-five days from the date of the docket control order. On February 27, 2009, we issued an order staying the March 2, 2009 bench trial, and requested a response from real party in interest, Melinda Thompkins.
On March 4, 2009, relator and Thompkins filed a notice in this court of their agreement that the trial court sign a docket control order setting deadlines for discovery, intervention, or parties, and setting a trial date no earlier than forty-five days from the date of the docket control order. Relator=s requested relief is moot.
Accordingly, we deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus. We further lift the stay issued on February 27, 2009.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Anderson and Seymore.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Andres Waibel, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-andres-waibel-texapp-2009.