In re Andre B.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Andre B.

266 A.D.2d 126, 698 N.Y.S.2d 145, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12048

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 23, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 266 A.D.2d 126 (In re Andre B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Andre B., 266 A.D.2d 126, 698 N.Y.S.2d 145, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12048 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Sheldon Rand, J.), entered on or about October 6, 1997, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of tampering with a witness in the fourth degree and menacing in the third degree, directed him to reside with his maternal grandmother, and placed him on probation for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the court’s credibility determinations. Concur— Sullivan, J. P., Wallach, Rubin, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Sheldon Rand, J.), entered on or about October 6, 1997, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of tampering with a witness in the fourth degree and menacing in the third degree, directed him to reside with his maternal grandmother, and placed him on probation for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the court’s credibility determinations. Concur— Sullivan, J. P., Wallach, Rubin, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

266 A.D.2d 126, 698 N.Y.S.2d 145, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12048, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-andre-b-nyappdiv-1999.