In re Anderson
4 Thomp. & Cook 658
Opinion
The only question involved was whether there was proper proof of publication, which was of the same character as that in Petition of Phillips, ante, p. 484, and the same doctrine was held as in that case. It was also held that the cases of Matter of Douglass, 46 N. Y. 42, and Matter of Astor, 50 id. 363, did not conflict with such doctrine.
Order reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Anderson, 4 Thomp. & Cook 658 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1874).
4 Thomp. & Cook 658 (In re Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re the Petition of George Douglass
46 N.Y. 42 (New York Court of Appeals, 1871)