In re Anderson

232 A.D. 704

This text of 232 A.D. 704 (In re Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Anderson, 232 A.D. 704 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

Order of the Surrogate’s Court of Kings county determining the respondent’s charges for services reversed upon the law and the facts, without costs, and proceeding remitted to the surrogate to enter a new decree fixing the respondent’s charges at $2,250. We are of opinion that the charge for collecting the insurance paid by the Travelers Insurance Company of Hartford was not only excessive but should not have been charged at all. The sum of $2,250 is ample compensation for the services already performed by the respondent in the matter of the probate of the will and for collecting the insurance paid by the Commercial Travelers Mutual Accident Association of America. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Carswell and Seudder, JJ., concur; Hagarty, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
232 A.D. 704, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-anderson-nyappdiv-1931.