In re Anderson
This text of 60 A.3d 451 (In re Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[452]*452ORDER
On consideration of the certified order of the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board revoking respondent’s license to practice law in that jurisdiction, this court’s October 16, 2012, order suspending respondent pending further action of the court and directing her to show cause why the functional equivalent reciprocal discipline of disbarment should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file a response to this court’s order to show cause or the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is
ORDERED that Erin M. Weber Anderson, is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. See In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007), and In re Willingham, 900 A.2d 165 (D.C.2006) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate). It is
FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement, respondent’s suspension will not begin to run until such time as she files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C.Bar. R. XI, § 14(g).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 A.3d 451, 2013 WL 451903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-anderson-dc-2013.