In re Anderson

86 F. App'x 670
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 12, 2004
DocketNo. 03-7579
StatusPublished

This text of 86 F. App'x 670 (In re Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Anderson, 86 F. App'x 670 (4th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Marvin R. Anderson petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the docket sheet reveals that the district court recently denied his motion. See United States v. Anderson, No. CR-99-239 [671]*671(S.D.W.Va. Dec. 2, 2003). Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Anderson’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
86 F. App'x 670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-anderson-ca4-2004.